Discuss, Learn and be Happy דיון בשאלות

help brightness_4 brightness_7 format_textdirection_r_to_l format_textdirection_l_to_r

Question: What did the Eastern Question mainly deal with during most of the 19th century?

1
done
Explanation: In the lectures, the Eastern Question is framed primarily as the European great-power problem of the Ottoman Empire’s expected decline—who will get which territories and under what timing/conditions once it collapses. (Lecture/Reading: Ram, Middle East Drug Cultures in the Long View.)
by
מיין לפי

Question: What was one of the factors behind the creation of the public sphere in Europe and the Middle East during the Enlightenment era?

1
done
Explanation : The lectures link the emergence of a “public sphere” in Europe and the Middle East to new practices and spaces of sociability—especially coffee and tobacco consumption in coffeehouses—which enabled regular gathering, conversation, and the circulation of opinions. The wider imperial and trade networks explain how these commodities and habits spread, but the direct “public sphere” mechanism is mainly coffeehouse sociability. (Lecture/Reading: Grehan, “Smoking and sociability in the Ottoman Empire”; broader global-context framing: Breen, The Age of Intoxication.)
by
מיין לפי

Question: What was the defining division that emerged in the public sphere in the new era?

1
done
Explanation: In the lectures, the “new” public sphere is described as gendered: the coffeehouse (qahvehkhaneh/café) became a largely male space of sociability and talk, while the tea house/tea space was more associated with women and domestic sociability. (Lecture/Reading: Grehan, “Smoking and sociability in the Ottoman Empire”.)
by
מיין לפי

Question: Why were coffeehouses in the Middle East so popular?

1
done
Explanation: The readings describe coffeehouses as central sites of sociability in the Middle East—places to meet, talk, and spend time together, often alongside coffee and tobacco (and sometimes other intoxicants), which explains their wide popularity. (Lecture/Reading: Grehan, “Smoking and sociability in the Ottoman Empire”.)
by
מיין לפי

Question: Which social class did hashish, wine, and opium belong to in the Middle East?

1
done
Explanation: In the lectures, hashish is associated mainly with lower-class / popular consumption, while wine and opium are more tied to elite/upper-class settings (courtly/medical/affluent use). (Lecture/Reading: Ram, Middle East Drug Cultures in the Long View.)
by
מיין לפי

Question: When and how did tobacco arrive in Europe?

1
done
Explanation: Tobacco was encountered by Europeans in the New World after 1492 and spread into Europe in the 16th century; the reading notes it reached Europe within decades of Columbus’s voyage. (Lecture/Reading: Ram, “Middle East Drug Cultures in the Long View”).
by
מיין לפי

Question: What caused opposition to coffeehouses when they first emerged?

1
done
Explanation: The lectures describe early coffeehouse opposition as driven mainly by state anxiety over coffeehouses enabling political discussion and criticism of rulers (“speech against the government”), making them potential sites of dissent. (Lecture/Reading: Grehan, “Smoking and sociability in the Ottoman Empire”; also in Ram, Middle East Drug Cultures in the Long View.)
by
מיין לפי

Question: What led to the rapid spread (within 150 years) of intoxicants such as cannabis, coffee, coca, tea, and cappiano?

1
done
Explanation: The lectures frame the fast global circulation of intoxicants as driven by expanding imperial and commercial networks (especially from the 16th century), alongside new social institutions and consumption spaces that helped normalize and spread these commodities—so the combined factors listed in A–C work together. (Lecture/Reading: Breen, The Age of Intoxication; plus sociability/public sphere context in Grehan.)
by
מיין לפי

Question: Who was Édouard Liénard?

1
done
Explanation: In the lectures, Édouard Liénard appears as a 19th-century folklorist whose accounts contributed to European representations of hashish. (Lecture/Reading: Ram, Hashishophobia; also connected to Guba de Sacy and the “myth of the Hashishin”.)
by
מיין לפי

Question: What was the main reason for the conflict between Britain and China over opium?

1
done
Explanation: The lectures describe the core conflict as Britain pushing to maintain/expand the opium trade into China (to secure revenue and balance trade), while Chinese authorities tried to stop the import and its social/economic damage—this clash escalated into war. (Lecture/Reading: Breen, The Age of Intoxication; also appears in Wright, Not Just a “Place for the Smoking of Opium”.)
by
מיין לפי