Discuss, Learn and be Happy דיון בשאלות

help brightness_4 brightness_7 format_textdirection_r_to_l format_textdirection_l_to_r

Question: Who was the first to link hashish to the members of the “Hashish Brotherhood” (the Hashishin/Assassins)?

1
done
Explanation: The lectures credit Silvestre de Sacy with making the philological argument that connected the term Hashishin/Hashishiyyin to hashish in European scholarship, helping cement the association in modern European writing. (Lecture/Reading: Guba de Sacy, “de Sacy and the myth of the Hashishin”.)
by
מיין לפי

Question: What is the basis for the connection between the “Hashish Brotherhood” and hashish?

1
done
Explanation: The lectures emphasize that the hashish link rests mainly on polemical Sunni sources that used Hashishiyyin/Hashishin as a term of abuse, later taken up and reinterpreted by European writers (not on direct evidence of systematic hashish use). (Lecture/Reading: Guba de Sacy, “de Sacy and the myth of the Hashishin”; also in Ram, Hashishophobia.)
by
מיין לפי

Question: Who was Silvestre de Sacy?

1
done
Explanation: In the lectures, Silvestre de Sacy is presented as a foundational French Orientalist—a key scholar who helped establish modern Oriental studies and whose philological work influenced European understandings of terms like “Hashishin.” (Lecture/Reading: Guba de Sacy and the myth of the Hashishin; also referenced in Ram, Hashishophobia.)
by
מיין לפי

Question: What does the term “hashish club” refer to?

1
done
Explanation: In the lectures, the “Hashish Club” refers to the Parisian circle (often discussed as Club des Hashischins) of 19th-century writers/intellectuals who experimented with hashish and produced texts about those experiences. (Lecture/Reading: Boon, The Road of Excess, Chapter 3; also connected to European hashish imaginaries in Ram, Hashishophobia.)
by
מיין לפי

Question: What does the term “the yellow peril” refer to?

1
done
Explanation: In the lectures, “the yellow peril” is framed as a late-19th-century American racial panic about Chinese immigrants as a threatening presence that would “corrupt” society—often linked to anti-Chinese politics and the stigmatization of opium dens. (Lecture/Reading: Wright, Not Just a “Place for the Smoking of Opium”; also fits the “reverse colonialism” anxiety discussed in Ram, Squaring the Circle.)
by
מיין לפי

Question: What is the significance of the Harrison Act enacted in the United States in 1914?

1
done
Explanation: In the lectures, the Harrison Narcotics Tax Act (1914) is presented as a key U.S. turning point that medicalized and regulated narcotics by restricting their legal distribution to medical channels, framing non-medical use as illegitimate and putting “addiction” under medical/legal control. (Lecture/Reading: Breen, The Age of Intoxication; also consistent with U.S. anti-opium/anti-Chinese regulation context in Wright, Not Just a “Place for the Smoking of Opium”.)
by
מיין לפי

Question: Which minority groups associated opium and marijuana in the United States at the beginning of the 20th century?

1
sentiment_very_satisfied
Explanation: In the lectures, early U.S. drug panics racialized substances: opium was stigmatized through association with Chinese immigrants/opium dens, while cannabis later became linked to Mexicans. The lectures also note that before this “Mexican” association, smoked cannabis use was attributed to Africans who arrived in the U.S.; once cannabis was identified with Mexicans, it was framed as a foreign drug. Relatedly, the term “marijuana” became common only after this Mexican association—before that it was generally referred to as “cannabis.” (Lecture/Reading: Wright, Not Just a “Place for the Smoking of Opium”; broader racialized framing also discussed in Ram, Squaring the Circle.)
by
מיין לפי

Question: Who was Harry J. Anslinger?

1
done
Explanation: In the lectures, Harry J. Anslinger is presented as the long-serving head of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Narcotics (from 1930), a central figure in building U.S. anti-drug policy and shaping international prohibition frameworks—hence the “father of the global drug regime” framing. (Lecture/Reading: Boon, The Road of Excess, Chapter 3; also connected to modern control regimes in Breen, The Age of Intoxication.)
by
מיין לפי

Question: What symptoms did the head of the American Bureau of Narcotics claim occurred as a result of marijuana use in the United States in the 1930s?

1
done
Explanation: In the lectures, Anslinger-era rhetoric is presented as a moral panic that attributed extreme, sensational “symptoms” to marijuana—here: hallucinatory rage, sexual dreams, and madness—to justify harsher control. (Lecture/Reading: Boon, The Road of Excess, Chapter 3.)
by
מיין לפי

Question: When was the marijuana tax law enacted in the United States, and what did it determine?

1
done
Explanation: The lectures describe the 1937 U.S. Marijuana Tax Act as a key step in prohibition by regulating marijuana through mandatory registration and taxation, effectively criminalizing non-compliance and restricting the market. (Lecture/Reading: Boon, The Road of Excess, Chapter 3; also linked to Anslinger-era policy.)
by
מיין לפי