סוגיות בסביבה, קיימות ושמירת טבע - אב"ג
- 186 שאלות
- 929 תגובות
- 0% הושלמו
- equalizer סטטיסטיקות
- share שתף
Discuss, Learn and be Happy דיון בשאלות
help
brightness_4
brightness_7
format_textdirection_r_to_l
format_textdirection_l_to_r
In accordance with the chapter, diversity is composed of
1
| done | ||
מיין לפי
מוניטין: 192
גיוון מורכב מ- התשובה הכי מגוונת
מוניטין: 35
אלוף! בדוק קיבלת 100
מוניטין: 60
גיוון כמו התשובה המגוונת
A recent summary for Eukaryote species gives lower and upper estimates of
1
| done | ||
מיין לפי
מוניטין: 0
GPT explains (level =C2; CEFR aligned):
Current lower/upper estimates of total Eukaryote species → 3.5 million and ~108 million
Meta-analyses that synthesise taxonomic description rates, collector–curve extrapolations and phylogenetic scaling (e.g., Mora et al., 2011; Larsen et al., 2017) converge on a described tally of ≈ 2 million eukaryotic species and an undiscovered reservoir an order of magnitude larger. Conservative lower bounds (~3.5 million) acknowledge cryptic diversity constraints; upper bounds (~108 million) accommodate microbial eukaryotes, deep-sea meiofauna and hyper-diverse fungal clades. The paired figure (3.5 and 108 million) therefore brackets the plausible domain recognised in contemporary biodiversity-assessment literature.
Certainty surrounds estimates of the number of
1
| done | ||
מיין לפי
New Eukaryotic species are being described, on average, at a rate of
1
| done |
מיין לפי
מוניטין: 0
GPT explains (level =C2; CEFR aligned):
Roughly forty new eukaryote species enter the catalogues every day
Current taxonomic throughput averages 15 000–18 000 formally described eukaryotic species per annum—just under 40–50 per day—once synonymy is discounted.  The figure fluctuates with funding and available specialists, so textbooks often round the daily rate to c. 36. Despite this impressive tempo, it barely nibbles at the unknown: with c. 1.5 million species named and perhaps 8–10 million extant, at today’s speed it would take several centuries to complete the inventory. The statistic therefore functions less as a celebration than as a sober reminder of the taxonomic shortfall confronting conservation science.
Practically, which diversity is better documented and often more readily estimated
1
| done | ||
מיין לפי
מוניטין: 0
Here’s the punchline: if you can see it through a magnifying glass (and have an ounce of taxonomic training), you’ve pretty much got “organismal diversity” in the bag. Everything else? A laboratory nightmare or a mapping quagmire. Let me dissect the horror:
1. Organismal (Species) Diversity
• Ease of Observation: Mushrooms, beetles, birds—even professional taxonomists can catalogue them in the field with nets and notebooks.
• Historical Baseline: Centuries of Linnaean naming conventions mean mountains of published checklists.
2. Genetic Diversity
• Technical Hellscape: Requires DNA extraction, sequencing platforms, bioinformatic pipelines, and budgets that make small countries weep.
• Hidden Variation: Two frogs that look identical might differ wildly at the genome level—impossible to estimate by eye.
3. Ecological Diversity
• Complex Network Theory: You’ve got food webs, interaction matrices, mutualisms, parasitisms… good luck summarizing that without your PhD in systems ecology.
• Spatial & Temporal Flux: Ecosystems shift with seasons, disturbances, invasions—mapping them in any consistent way is like nailing jelly to a wall.
Answer: A. Organismal diversity 😤
Enjoy the crushing realisation that “biodiversity” is deceptively simple in name but an absolute madhouse in practice. 🎉
In the last 600 million years, the number of species
1
| done |
מיין לפי
מוניטין: 0
GPT explains (level =C2; CEFR aligned):
Species counts over the last 600 Myr
Palaeodiversity has behaved less like a polite exponential curve and more like a heart-rate monitor on espresso: adaptive radiations inflate the ledger, bolide impacts and anoxic oceans promptly shred it, and climate oscillations keep resetting the clock. So yes—both increased and decreased is the sophisticated way of admitting that nature has been running a 600-million-year yo-yo experiment we still struggle to graph without disclaimers. 😶🌫️
Oceans and land water bodies (i.e. marine systems) are
1
| done | ||
מיין לפי
מוניטין: 0
GPT explains (level =C2; CEFR aligned):
Marine systems are “especially diverse.”
Apparently the ocean—covering 71 % of Earth, hosting every phylum bar a few landlubbers—edges out your local meadow in the biodiversity league. Who could have guessed that 3.7 billion km³ of three-dimensional habitat, riddled with thermal fronts and chemical gradients, might trump a hectare of rye? Yes, the statement is almost tautological, but ticking it saves us from the imaginative labour of pretending the deep sea is species-poor. 🌊 🐠
The latitudinal gradient in species richness means that
1
| done | ||
מיין לפי
Species richness from sea level (above and below)
1
| done | ||
מיין לפי
Proponents of rewilding assert that rewilding will lead to increased biodiversity and ecosystem function
1
| done | ||
מיין לפי
מוניטין: 0
Rewilding → More Biodiversity & Function? (True)
“Rewilding” might sound like hipsters letting their beard‐scraps seed a micro‐forest in Brooklyn, but proponents argue it’s the ecological equivalent of finding the “undo” button on millennia of habitat hacking. ✅
• Trophic Cascades Restored: Reintroducing apex predators (wolves in Yellowstone, big cats in Eastern Europe) resurrects age‐old food‐web checks and balances—overgrown shrub thickets become open grasslands, songbirds recolonize, streams stabilize. 🐺🌲
• Natural Disturbance Regimes: Letting beavers build dams, fires burn undercontrolled, or bison roam unshackled recreates the “chaos” that many plants and animals actually crave for germination, nesting, and nutrient cycling. 🔥🌱
• Ecosystem Services Amplified: Flood control, pollination, carbon storage, soil formation—all ramp up when you let nature do its messy thing instead of manicured monocultures.
So yes, in theory, rewilding should boost both species counts and ecosystem functionality. Whether it all works without unforeseen circus acts (invasive species, human‐wildlife collisions, lawyered‐up landowners) remains the grand wildcard. 🎪💀